What can we learn from case studies of engineering leadership programing across Canada?

Cindy Rottmann

Download Chapter PDF

 

Author

Cindy Rottmann
University of Toronto

The case study method has been used for more than a century in professional educational settings such as law, business, and engineering to prepare students for professional practice (Agle et al., 2016; Bertha, 2010; Loendorf, 2009; Martin et al., 2021; Rottmann, 2021). In contrast to problem sets with defined answers or design projects with defined process, case studies help learners imagine and navigate the more ambiguous elements of their work. They enable students to study social and technical issues in organizational contexts, giving them a feel for professional practice before graduation.

In the social sciences, case studies are not only useful pedagogical tools, but also a methodological tool used by researchers to study a phenomenon in context (Bassey, 2003; Merriam, 1998; Stake, 1995, 2003; Yin, 1993; Yin, 2014). According to Yin (2014), case studies “investigate a contemporary phenomenon in its real-world context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident” (p.2). Engineering leadership in Canada is a phenomenon that cannot be separated from the many contexts in which it takes root. There is no singular “best practice” of leadership learning that can be deposited into any educational setting without adapting to the strategic priorities, policies, practices, and culture of the institution. Rather, what we see when we speak to our EL colleagues, is a wide range of initiatives, courses, programs, and clubs that have been attempted, formalized, and optimized in engineering faculties with distinct organizational cultures, regional flavours, and varied levels of administrative, industrial, departmental, staff, and student support. This book uses the term “case study “in both senses, as a pedagogical tool and as an investigation of EL development in context.

As an emerging body of research, EL case studies have a great deal to teach us about formal and informal change in higher education. First, since leadership development remains peripheral to the core engineering curriculum and to our national accreditation board (CEAB, 2021), EL case studies teach us how engineering educators have institutionalized curricular and co-curricular change from the bottom up. Second, in a more tacit way, EL case studies teach us who cared enough to plant the seed of EL change in each institutional context, what supports were necessary to keep them going, which curricular and co-curricular spaces were most amenable to EL education, which pedagogical strategies have supported students’ leadership development, and what impact these initiatives have had on students, faculty, staff, and the profession. That is, in the absence of a centralized EL mandate or a leadership-specific professional accreditation drive, a Canadian collection of EL case studies makes an important contribution to the larger body of literature on higher education reform in Canada—one champion, one classroom, one co-curricular program, and one institute at a time.

While this kind of work has been done in the United States (Donald & Jamieson, 2022; Kendall & Rottmann, 2022; Klassen et al., 2020; Klassen et al., 2016), we have become increasingly aware that EL programing looks different in Canada and cannot be adequately represented through a single case study. The current collection of Canadian EL case studies allows us to shift from the periphery of a North American text to the centre of our own text, mapping out the state of EL education in Canada as a professional formation process in its own right with national, regional, and institutional flavours. The  case studies in this book help us understand the phenomenon of engineering leadership in multiple faculties of engineering—how they have taken root, flourished, floundered, and changed over time. The key features of these initiatives have been shared as oral narratives, lunchtime discussions, zoom chats, and conference papers in three related networks (CEEA/ACEG SELM, NICKEL, ASEE-LEAD), and are now ready to be documented and analyzed as a living library of Canadian EL change projects.

 

References

Agle, B., Miller, A., & O’Rourke, B. (2016). The Business Ethics Field Guide: The Essential Companion to Leading Your Career and your Organization to Greatness. Ethics Field Guide LLC.

Bassey, M. (2003). Case Study Research in Educational Settings. Open University Press.

Bertha, C. (2010). How to teach an engineering ethics course with case studies. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KT.

CEAB. (2021). Accreditation Criteria and Procedures. C. C. o. P. Engineers. https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/2021-11/2021%20Accreditation%20Criteria%20Book%20Word.pdf

Donald, J. R., & Jamieson, M. V. (2022). Diversity of engineering leadership program design. In M. Kendall & C. Rottmann (Eds.), New Directions in Student Leadership: No 173. Student leadership development in engineering (pp. 83-91). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20482

Kendall, M., & Rottmann, C. (Eds.). (2022). New Directions for Student Leadership: Student Leadership Development in Engineering (Vol. 173). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20474.

Klassen, M., Reeve, D., Evans, G., Rottmann, C., Sheridan, P. K., & Simpson, A. E. (2020). Engineering: Moving leadership from the periphery to the core of an intensely technical curriculum. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2020(165), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20373

Klassen, M., Reeve, D., Rottmann, C., Sacks, R., Simpson, A. E., & Huynh, A. (2016). Charting the landscape of engineering leadership education in North American universities. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA.

Loendorf, W. (2009). The case study approach to engineering ethics. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, Austin, TX.

Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). Using case studies in engineering ethics education: the case for immersive scenarios through stakeholder engagement and real life data. Australasian journal of engineering education., 26(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2021.1914297

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Rottmann, C. (2021, April 12th). Centring equity in engineering ethics case study instruction. SEFI Ethics Blog, 2021(3).

Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage.

Stake, R. E. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 134-164). SAGE.

Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research. Sage.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research : design and methods (5 edition. ed.). SAGE.

 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Canadian Engineering Leadership Program Case Studies 2024 Copyright © by John Donald and Marnie V. Jamieson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book